Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are bringing out the Dream Workforce.
The railroads reached into academia to collect a quartet of former authorities anti-trust consultants in an effort to refute the most recent submitting by crimson state Attorneys Common urging regulators to reject the proposed merger that might create the primary U.S. transcontinental freight railroad.
In a nine-page submitting submitted Wednesday to the Floor Transportation Board that learn like a authorized temporary full with citations, the consultants cautioned that merger complaints stand as conjecture – and never proof. They provided case histories and tutorial analysis supporting earlier company tie-ups that have been additionally contested on anti-trust grounds, and the way opponents use the courts to hinder mergers.
The submitting this week by the highest legislation enforcement officers from seven Republican states mentioned that the merger of UP (NYSE: UNP) and NS (NYSE: NSC) gained’t improve competitors as required by STB guidelines, and can increase prices for shippers and shoppers.
The consultants writing for UP-NS are Alden Abbott, normal counsel of the Federal Commerce Fee from 2018-2021, now at George Mason College; Tad Lipsky, Jr., deputy assistant lawyer normal within the Division of Justice Antitrust Division from 1981–1983 and chief antitrust lawyer at Coca-Cola from 1992–2002, additionally at George Mason, as is Gregory Werden, former DOJ Antitrust Division economist and lawyer; and Mark Whitener, former international govt counsel for competitors legislation and coverage for Common Electrical and deputy director of the Federal Commerce Fee’s Bureau of Competitors from 1993–1997, now affiliated with Georgetown College.
The lots of of filings for and towards the merger carry no authorized weight; STB Chairman Patrick Fuchs has made it clear that the deal will stand by itself deserves as evaluated by his company. Fuchs earlier assembled his personal staff of knowledge scientists from MIT to interrupt down the numbers, and has fiercely defended the STB’s independence and decision-making course of.
The consultants additionally cited case historical past exhibiting how opponents of mergers are inherently incentivized to guard their very own pursuits, and never essentially these of the patron.
“Railroad rivals should not disinterested observers of this transaction; they’re business rivals that presumably stand to lose site visitors if the merged UP–NS affords a superior service product,” they wrote. “Their opposition ought to be understood as advocacy by market members to guard their backside line – not as goal proof of seemingly hurt to shippers or the aggressive course of.
“[S]ingle-line integration,” they mentioned, “can create a lower-cost, extra environment friendly service that intensifies total modal rivalry.”
Subscribe to BigRig’ Rail e-newsletter and get the most recent insights on rail freight proper in your inbox.
Learn extra articles by Editor right here.
Learn extra:
Rail freight stretches lead over 2025
Federal courtroom upholds problem to FRA’s two-person rail crew rule
BNSF earnings rise on larger quantity and income
AAR launches freight rail analysis consortium
Rail merger a failure on first sight, shippers protest
The publish Battle of the briefs: UP-NS fires again at AGs anti-merger letter appeared first on BigRig.