Close Menu
BigRigBigRig
  • Home
  • News
  • Trucking
    • Truckload
    • LTL
    • Driver Issues
    • Equipment
    • Regulation
    • Fraud
    • Logistics
    • CDL Issues
  • Business
    • Finance
    • Supply Chains
    • Technology
    • Trade Compliance
  • Maritime
    • Container
    • Maritime History
    • Shipping
  • About Us
What's Hot

First look: J.B. Hunt’s Q3 earnings

October 15, 2026

Fleetworthy expands Expedited Inspection to 5 states

October 15, 2026

R&R trucking CEO studies $12.7M in belongings after firm collapse

October 15, 2026
BigRigBigRig
  • Home
  • News
  • Trucking
    • Truckload
    • LTL
    • Driver Issues
    • Equipment
    • Regulation
    • Fraud
    • Logistics
    • CDL Issues
  • Business
    • Finance
    • Supply Chains
    • Technology
    • Trade Compliance
  • Maritime
    • Container
    • Maritime History
    • Shipping
  • About Us
BigRigBigRig
Home»Trucking»Driver Issues»Garten Trucking attraction on NLRB order rejected by SCOTUS
Driver Issues

Garten Trucking attraction on NLRB order rejected by SCOTUS

October 7, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Copy Link Email Telegram Pinterest Tumblr
Garten Trucking attraction on NLRB order rejected by SCOTUS
Share
Copy Link Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email


The U.S. Supreme Court docket has rejected the certiorari request of a small Virginia trucking firm that had been ordered by the Nationwide Labor Relations Board (NLRB), after which a federal appellate courtroom, to barter with a union looking for to characterize the corporate’s drivers.

With out remark, the Supreme Court docket on Monday–the primary day of its time period–rejected the request of Gartner Trucking of Covington, Virginia to evaluation the choice from earlier this yr handed down by the Fourth Circuit.

In that call, the circuit backed the NLRB’s order that Gartner negotiate with the Affiliation of Western Pulp and Paper Staff who’ve sought to arrange the corporate’s drivers. Gartner’s major enterprise is hauling paper merchandise.

window.googletag = window.googletag || {cmd: []};
googletag.cmd.push(perform() {
var gptSlot = googletag.defineSlot(‘/21776187881/FW-Responsive-Main_Content-Slot1’, [[300, 100], [320, 50], [728, 90], [468, 60]], ‘div-gpt-ad-1709668545404-0’).defineSizeMapping(gptSizeMaps.banner1).addService(googletag.pubads());
googletag.pubads().enableSingleRequest();
googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs();
googletag.enableServices();
setInterval(perform() {
if (!doc.hidden) { googletag.pubads().refresh([gptSlot]); }
}, 30000);
});

googletag.cmd.push(perform() { googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-1709668545404-0’); });

The battle between the union and the corporate–which the Fourth Circuit described as that includes “bitter and prolonged disputes”–goes again to an August 2021 vote the place the rank and file in Covington rejected the union by a vote of 65-30. Nevertheless it didn’t finish there.

Struggle continues after failed vote

In accordance with a recap of the combat within the Fourth Circuit resolution, the union filed “a bevy of unfair labor follow expenses” in opposition to Garten for actions it took main up the vote in addition to afterward.

The union formally filed these expenses with the NLRB, “contending that these violations fatally tainted the election outcomes,” in line with the Fourth Circuit abstract. 

An administrative regulation choose (ALJ) heard the case in February 2023 and concluded Garten had engaged in a number of unfair labor practices:  unlawfully interrogating workers; creating an impression that union actions had been underneath surveillance; threatening closure of the enterprise; and making disciplinary threats.

The ALJ ordered a brand new election be held, an motion often known as a Gissel order after a 1969 Supreme Court docket resolution additionally involving the NLRB that gave the board energy to name for a brand new referendum ought to it discover unfair labor practices might have tainted a vote. 

Garten then filed objections with the NLRB. There isn’t any proof within the report to recommend the  second election has taken place.

window.googletag = window.googletag || {cmd: []};
googletag.cmd.push(perform() {
var gptSlot = googletag.defineSlot(‘/21776187881/fw-responsive-main_content-slot3’, [[728, 90], [468, 60], [320, 50], [300, 100]], ‘div-gpt-ad-1665767553440-0’).defineSizeMapping(gptSizeMaps.banner1).addService(googletag.pubads());
googletag.pubads().enableSingleRequest();
googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs();
googletag.enableServices();
setInterval(perform() {
if (!doc.hidden) { googletag.pubads().refresh([gptSlot]); }
}, 30000);
});

googletag.cmd.push(perform() { googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-1665767553440-0’); });

The NLRB in September 2023 affirmed the findings of the ALJ. Garten appealed to the Fourth Circuit. 

What’s First Modification protected?

The NLRB and the appellate courtroom wanted to cope with problems with the First Modification, particularly, what may Garten say that was protected speech and what may it not say as a result of it will be thought-about unfair coercion?

“There  is a basic distinction between speech imposing a correct quid professional quo and speech which merely makes an attempt to influence on the deserves, leaving workers free to vote with out penalty or reward dangling over their heads,” the appellate courtroom stated.

Finally, the Fourth  Circuit discovered a press release by the corporate administration–“as a matter of truth if it wasn’t for the union making an attempt to steal cash out of your paychecks you’ll have already got your raises”–as proof Garten had “crossed the road” between protected and coercive speech.

window.googletag = window.googletag || {cmd: []};
googletag.cmd.push(perform() {
var gptSlot = googletag.defineSlot(‘/21776187881/fw-responsive-main_content-slot4’, [[300, 100], [320, 50], [728, 90], [468, 60]], ‘div-gpt-ad-1709668086344-0’).defineSizeMapping(gptSizeMaps.banner1).addService(googletag.pubads());
googletag.pubads().enableSingleRequest();
googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs();
googletag.enableServices();
setInterval(perform() {
if (!doc.hidden) { googletag.pubads().refresh([gptSlot]); }
}, 30000);
});

googletag.cmd.push(perform() { googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-1709668086344-0’); });

It upheld the NLRB order for a brand new vote.

In its now-rejected petition for certiorari, Garten stated the method main as much as the election was “honest and untainted.”

“Quite a lot of witnesses known as by Basic Counsel testified that they had been free to debate the Union with out concern or stress, wore union paraphernalia with out consequence and by no means heard administration say that there could be hostile penalties in the event that they supported the union.”

The Garten petition additionally stated workers “weren’t requested to determine who supported the union, questioned about their very own union actions or the union actions of others, requested who signed a card, or who attended union conferences.”

Extra articles by John Kingston

FMCSA’s Elison: ‘weeks’ away from fixing Motus person expertise

window.googletag = window.googletag || {cmd: []};
googletag.cmd.push(perform() {
var gptSlot = googletag.defineSlot(‘/21776187881/fw-responsive-main_content-slot5’, [[728, 90], [468, 60], [320, 50], [300, 100]], ‘div-gpt-ad-1665767778941-0’).defineSizeMapping(gptSizeMaps.banner1).addService(googletag.pubads());
googletag.pubads().enableSingleRequest();
googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs();
googletag.enableServices();
setInterval(perform() {
if (!doc.hidden) { googletag.pubads().refresh([gptSlot]); }
}, 30000);
});

googletag.cmd.push(perform() { googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-1665767778941-0’); });

Wall Road analysts optimistic on C.H. Robinson deal; S&P extra cautious

Cybersecurity portal to combat unhealthy guys open for enterprise: NMFTA

The put up Garten Trucking attraction on NLRB order rejected by SCOTUS appeared first on BigRig.

Share. Copy Link Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email WhatsApp Telegram
Previous ArticleStripe faucets FedEx knowledge to broaden small enterprise entry to financing
Next Article Union Pacific CEO ‘99.99%’ assured rail merger will win approval

Related Posts

Driver scarcity modifications the playbook for personal fleet security 

September 16, 2026

TruckSmarter shutting down – BigRig

September 2, 2026

New plan for NYC’s BQE includes short-term roads: Mamdani

August 24, 2026
Demo
Top Posts

Bot Auto commits to U.S.-based distant help operators

August 28, 2026

700 kilos of meth hidden in cucumber load results in 15-year jail sentences

August 27, 2026

Seasonal ag truckers from Mexico face identical English-language guidelines, DOL says

September 1, 2026

Gofo parcel community shortly mushrooms in 2026

August 27, 2026

CBSA finds 385 kilos of cocaine in business truck at US-Canada border

August 26, 2026
Top Trending
Advert
Most Popular

Bot Auto commits to U.S.-based distant help operators

August 28, 2026

700 kilos of meth hidden in cucumber load results in 15-year jail sentences

August 27, 2026

Seasonal ag truckers from Mexico face identical English-language guidelines, DOL says

September 1, 2026
Our Picks

First look: J.B. Hunt’s Q3 earnings

October 15, 2026

Fleetworthy expands Expedited Inspection to 5 states

October 15, 2026

R&R trucking CEO studies $12.7M in belongings after firm collapse

October 15, 2026
About Us
About Us

BigRig covers the stories behind trucking, shipping, transportation and the people who keep commerce moving. We deliver timely, reliable news from trusted industry sources as developments unfold.

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2026 © Randall Reilly Talent, LLC. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.