Close Menu
BigRigBigRig
  • Home
  • News
  • Trucking
    • Truckload
    • LTL
    • Driver Issues
    • Equipment
    • Regulation
    • Fraud
    • Logistics
    • CDL Issues
  • Business
    • Finance
    • Supply Chains
    • Technology
    • Trade Compliance
  • Maritime
    • Container
    • Maritime History
    • Shipping
  • About Us
What's Hot

OXEA faucets Uber Freight to handle North American, European logistics

September 15, 2026

DOE/EIA value at file as diesel surge exhibits no signal of retreat

September 15, 2026

Houthi positive factors deepen threat as carriers restore Crimson Sea companies

September 15, 2026
BigRigBigRig
  • Home
  • News
  • Trucking
    • Truckload
    • LTL
    • Driver Issues
    • Equipment
    • Regulation
    • Fraud
    • Logistics
    • CDL Issues
  • Business
    • Finance
    • Supply Chains
    • Technology
    • Trade Compliance
  • Maritime
    • Container
    • Maritime History
    • Shipping
  • About Us
BigRigBigRig
Home»Business»Trade Compliance»FedEx, UPS, Oakley face lawsuits over Trump tariff refunds
Trade Compliance

FedEx, UPS, Oakley face lawsuits over Trump tariff refunds

February 28, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Copy Link Email Telegram Pinterest Tumblr
FedEx, UPS, Oakley face lawsuits over Trump tariff refunds
Share
Copy Link Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email


FedEx Corp., United Parcel Service and the maker of Ray-Ban and Oakley sun shades face proposed class motion lawsuits that search to get well funds for import duties and costs related to the Trump administration’s emergency tariffs that had been invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court docket final week. 

On Friday, harm regulation agency Morgan and Morgan filed swimsuit towards FedEx Logistics (NYSE: FDX) in U.S. District Court docket for Southern Florida in search of a full refund of duties paid by a person in Miami and in search of to signify thousands and thousands of different shoppers equally impacted the tariffs and costs handed on by FedEx after paying the federal government. The plaintiff, Matthew Reiser, paid $36 in obligation and costs on a pair of tennis sneakers he purchased from Tennis Warehouse Europe, a German firm, on Jan. 27. 

“FedEx is the one entity with authorized standing to hunt a refund of duties straight from the federal government. This leaves shoppers like our consumer with no selection however to attempt to legally compel FedEx to refund them for the tariffs that they had been charged by FedEx, to not point out the ancillary charges FedEx added to course of these transactions,” stated Morgan & Morgan founder John Morgan and legal professional John Yanchunis, in a press release. “Our purpose is to return to American shoppers each penny they had been improperly charged.”

New Yorker Nathan Ward on Thursday filed a proposed class motion lawsuit towards EssilorLuxottica S.A., the multinational maker of Ray-Ban, Oakley and Costa sun shades. The corporate has sued the U.S. authorities for a refund and will return any reimbursements obtained to clients it charged, the swimsuit says, noting that tariff surcharges elevated the worth of Ward’s buy by about 6% in comparison with costs within the spring of 2025.

Beforehand, Hali Anastopoulo, a freight forwarder and customs dealer in South Carolina, filed a number of lawsuits towards FedEx and UPS (NYSE: UPS) in federal district courts in South Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee for reimbursement of duties, curiosity and associated prices paid for parcel imports. The complaints, filed by the agency of Poulin Wiley, ask the courts to grant nationwide class-action standing for all individuals who paid UPS for tariffs declared underneath the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act. Anastopoulo is represented within the Tennessee case by Stranch Jennings & Garvey.

FedEx and UPS complaints are tied to the elimination final yr of an obligation exemption loved by importers of low-value items, usually shipped on to shoppers by way of parcel and postal channels. The top of the exemption subjected merchandise to excessive tariffs being imposed on international locations all over the world. 

The Supreme Court docket dominated that IEEPA doesn’t authorize the President to impose broad-based tariffs. Trump used the rationale that imports of the harmful drug fentanyl and the general U.S. commerce deficit had been nationwide emergencies that required speedy govt motion. Customs brokers like FedEx and UPS handed the prices of tariffs onto their clients, together with brokerage and clearance charges. 

The Court docket was mum on what ought to occur to greater than $130 billion in duties, plus curiosity, already collected. Authorized students and commerce professionals say it’s unclear if the federal government will comply with return cash to firms. It may very well be a while earlier than the U.S. Court docket of Worldwide Commerce and U.S. Customs and Border Safety roll out a course of for issuing refunds on IEEPA tariff duties and decide who’s eligible, commerce compliance specialists say.

On Monday, FedEx sued the U.S. authorities in search of a full refund of duties paid underneath the IEEPA order. The corporate publicly acknowledged it plans to return any refunds it receives to clients and shoppers who initially bore the fees, however the Morgan and Morgan lawsuit notes that the corporate didn’t make any legally binding promise in its criticism, nor has it talked about any plan to refund the additional processing charges it charged. 

Toymaker Hasbro, magnificence group L’Oreal and eyecare firm Bausch+Lomb additionally filed refund fits within the Court docket of Worldwide Commerce.

Click on right here for extra BigRig/American Shipper tales by Editor.

Write to Editor at editor@bigrigdatabase.net.

RELATED STORIES:

Buyer sues FedEx for refund after Supreme Court docket rejects Trump tariffs

FedEx redeploys air fleet after US ends parcel tariff exemption

The publish FedEx, UPS, Oakley face lawsuits over Trump tariff refunds appeared first on BigRig.

Share. Copy Link Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email WhatsApp Telegram
Previous ArticleCass, Caspian companion to deal with tariff prices
Next Article Derek Barrs defends FMCSA’s daring strikes at TCA

Related Posts

The SMB transport entice: Attempting to go it alone

August 7, 2026

Importers sue over pressured labor tariffs on 60 economies

July 28, 2026

Wove speeds tariff change data for forwarders, TMS – and it’s free

July 28, 2026
Demo
Top Posts

Bot Auto commits to U.S.-based distant help operators

August 28, 2026

700 kilos of meth hidden in cucumber load results in 15-year jail sentences

August 27, 2026

Seasonal ag truckers from Mexico face identical English-language guidelines, DOL says

September 1, 2026

Gofo parcel community shortly mushrooms in 2026

August 27, 2026

CBSA finds 385 kilos of cocaine in business truck at US-Canada border

August 26, 2026
Top Trending
Advert
Most Popular

Bot Auto commits to U.S.-based distant help operators

August 28, 2026

700 kilos of meth hidden in cucumber load results in 15-year jail sentences

August 27, 2026

Seasonal ag truckers from Mexico face identical English-language guidelines, DOL says

September 1, 2026
Our Picks

OXEA faucets Uber Freight to handle North American, European logistics

September 15, 2026

DOE/EIA value at file as diesel surge exhibits no signal of retreat

September 15, 2026

Houthi positive factors deepen threat as carriers restore Crimson Sea companies

September 15, 2026
About Us
About Us

BigRig covers the stories behind trucking, shipping, transportation and the people who keep commerce moving. We deliver timely, reliable news from trusted industry sources as developments unfold.

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
2026 © Randall Reilly Talent, LLC. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.